The pros are of using AI for content are obvious: content gets done faster, cheaper, and often technically better. But there are cons, too, like the fact that AI-generated content wears a stigma of cheating, a lazy shortcut. In fact, one study showed that most people would rather wait years for a lower-quality, human-written book than read a polished, AI-written one right now.
In this guide, I’ll show you everything you need to know about using AI to create content, while still feeling confident about it.

AI-generated images
Fake photos of Pope Francis in a puffer jacket. These Midjourney-generated images of the Pope wearing a stylish white coat fooled millions on social media, becoming one of the most viral examples of AI imagery. The photos looked so realistic that major news outlets had to fact-check them.

AI-generated video
Kalshi’s AI commercial. This became the first fully AI-generated advertisement aired during a major sporting event. The entire ad—visuals, voiceover, and music—was created using AI tools, proving that AI content could meet broadcast television standards.
AI-generated interactive content
Model Context Protocols, or simply MCPs, had a big take off in 2025, marking the next step in the evolution of chatbots. To see how this works in practice, let’s look at Ahrefs’ MCP for Claude. With direct access to Ahrefs’ database, you can ask about keywords, backlinks, or traffic potential and get instant, reliable insights. The experience feels less like using a tool and more like chatting with an SEO expert who’s always on hand to answer your questions.


Good AI content that’s been edited and personalized by humans is becoming nearly impossible to detect. Tools that “humanize” AI writing by adding small errors or changing patterns can easily fool most detectors.
We already know that most people would claim they can spot AI content, but what about AI detectors? Well, they work okay under perfect conditions—around 80% accuracy. They often fail when tested on content different from the ones they were trained on, and they struggle with content that mixes AI and human writing (which is most good AI content).
And did you know that 74% of new website content is now AI-generated? It backs up my point from a recent rant: AI is on track to become as common in content creation as robots are in car factories.

So, I’d say, don’t worry too much about detection. Focus on making your AI-assisted content genuinely useful and adding your own voice, experience, and insights. That’s what matters to your audience anyway.
Further reading


Here are the main takeaways.
AI adoption is massive
87% of marketing professionals now use AI for content creation.
Companies using AI are publishing 47% more content monthly and growing 5% faster than their competitors.
But here’s the important part: only 4% publish raw AI content. The other 97% are editing and reviewing everything, which explains why some AI content works while other stuff gets called out immediately.
What’s actually working
Most marketers use AI for blog content (87% use AI here), followed by website copy (64%) and social media (63%).

How exactly do they use it? More than half of respondents use it for brainstorming topics, creating outlines, editing, and optimizing headlines.

ChatGPT is the clear winner with 44% adoption among marketers, while Gemini and Claude trail behind at 15% and 10% respectively.
Are they happy with the results AI delivers?
65% believe human content is better quality, but 34% think AI and human content rank roughly the same in search. AI content is slightly more likely to get Google manual penalties but slightly less likely to be hurt by algorithm updates.
Despite mixed performance, 51% plan to increase AI spending next year.
And, the cost difference is impossible to ignore: human-only content averages $611 per article versus $131 for AI-assisted content.


Then, the tool maps out exactly which topics and subtopics I need to cover in any new article—or shows what’s missing in an existing article—by analyzing what’s actually ranking in the top 10 and a coverage score.

Other tools (with genuinely useful use cases)
Humans discovered AI that can make virtually anything, and they also discovered the AI paradox:

The more AI-generated content floods in, the less people seem to truly want it. So, maybe instead of just listing tools, let me share some genuinely cool use cases of AI content you can actually copy and the tools you’ll need to pull them off.
- Video hooks with Nano Banana.
- Animated product photos with Adobe Firefly.
- Humorous video ads with the latest models you can find on a platform like OpenArt. Somehow, AI cringe goes down surprisingly well when it’s served with a side of humor.
- Localized educational or product marketing videos with HeyGen.
- Ad variations and formats (in no time) with a tool like AdCreative.
- Vibe-coded online tools with Claude, like this one: AI vs Search Traffic Analysis.
- YouTube thumbnails to test ideas or cut costs when you’re just starting out with tools like Canva or Pikzels.
- Short-form content made from longer videos for YouTube Shorts, TikTok, and more with tools like Riverside or Opus.
- Animated inserts that highlight an important point or bring a story in your video to life with a tool like OpenArt.
- Last but not least, AI voiceovers are amazing these days. Try ElevenLabs.
Now, let’s look at the specific AI content rules on all the big platforms:
Platform | Policy & Disclosure Requirements |
---|---|
Google/SEO | Allows AI content if it meets E-E-A-T standards. No disclosure required. |
YouTube | Allows AI content but requires labeling for synthetic content that could mislead viewers. |
TikTok | Allows AI content but must label clearly in video or caption. Zero tolerance for undisclosed synthetic media of real people/events. |
No AI-specific policies. Disclosure optional unless content could mislead. | |
Allows AI content with no formal disclosure requirements. | |
Medium | Allows AI content but requires disclosure in story or reader note when AI plays significant role. |
X (Twitter) | No AI-specific policies. Disclosure required only for misleading synthetic media. |
Allows AI content but policies vary by subreddit. Check individual community rules first. | |
Allows AI content with automatic labeling via platform algorithms. | |
Quora | Allows AI content but may reduce visibility of AI-only answers. No specific disclosure requirements. |
Final thoughts
Interesting times. AI writes faster than we can read, makes images that can fool millions, and even generates videos good enough for TV. But here’s the twist: the better AI gets, the more people crave something it can’t replace—authentic human connection. And that part is your job. Let AI handle the rest.
Got questions or comments? Let me know on LinkedIn.
Similar Posts
Creating unique articles from imported RSS feeds using AI
Did you know that the [gpt_article] shortcode is perfect for creating unique articles with CyberSEO Pro…
Is SEO Dead? Real Data vs. Internet Hysteria
Has AI and social media killed SEO in 2025? Not even close. Here’s the thing: on one…
Only 12% of AI Cited URLs Rank in Google’s Top 10 for the Original Prompt
In a dataset of 15,000 prompts, we found that—on average—only 12% of links cited by ChatGPT,…
Role of AI Assistants in Streamlining Server Management
In today’s digital era, as artificial intelligence becomes the driving force behind innovation, organizations are searching…
AI, Nolia routers, AI data centers, sovereign cloud, Nokia networking, ResetData Australia, liquid immersion cooling, AI infrastructure
ResetData, an emerging Australian cloud service provider, has selected Nokia to supply the critical networking infrastructure…
How to Choose the Right NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50 Series GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50 series is the latest lineup of graphics cards, or known as…